A 45‑day
investigation,
closed by Thursday.
Traditional DFIR firms quote two to six weeks. Panels, onboarding, ticket queues, analyst availability. Grail's pipeline runs continuously — intake to admissible report — and clears most cases in a single business week.
Every hour a breach goes uninvestigated is an hour regulators, insurers, and attackers are making decisions for you.
Built for the threats coming next.
Not the ones from last decade.
Adversaries are weaponizing AI. Phishing is being written by language models, malware is being mutated at machine speed, and intrusion playbooks are running without a human at the keyboard. The DFIR firms still billing in 200‑hour blocks were built for a slower threat. Grail was built for this one — six purpose‑built AI agents running a full investigation in parallel, at the same speed your adversary moves.
Named, for the record, after knights who mostly failed the quest. We think that's appropriate.
↓ scoped case
↓ sealed artifacts
↓ timeline
↓ TTP mapping
↓ validated facts
↓ signed report
Every finding,
anchored to raw evidence.
"AI in security" usually means trust the model. Grail doesn't ask you to. Every claim in every report carries a direct reference to the artifact, the line, and the SHA‑256 hash it rests on.
The Black Knight agent re-checks every finding against source evidence before it ships. Unverifiable claims are dropped — not softened. Outputs are structured for Daubert admissibility, with chain‑of‑custody sealed end‑to‑end.
\\SysUpdateCheck within 94 seconds.
Two buyers. One pipeline.
Regulated teams
without a retainer.
You have a 1–3 person security team, a HIPAA audit on the calendar, and a board that doesn't want to hear about a $300K IR retainer you'll never use. Grail gives you incident response on demand, priced to what a breach actually costs your business.
- Healthcare, fintech, regional infrastructure
- 50–5,000 endpoints
- No DFIR retainer. No 200-hour engagements.
Panel DFIR,
predictably fast.
Replace the 30‑day panel vendor with a pipeline that closes claims in days — at a tenth of the cost per policyholder. Consistent methodology, consistent output format, consistent SLA. Underwriters get their loss numbers before reserves drift.
- Carriers, MGAs, reinsurers
- API‑driven claim intake
- Standardized admissible output
Same investigation.
Different order of magnitude.
Median figures across published retainer pricing and public post‑incident disclosures. {{ comparison_source }}
| Legacy IR retainers | Grail | |
|---|---|---|
| Time to findings | 14–45 daysQueued against analyst availability | < 48 hoursContinuous pipeline, no queue |
| Cost per investigation | $25K–$200KHourly analyst billing | Engagement-based pricingPredictable, capped per case |
| Analyst hours required | 200–400 hrsManual evidence review | 0Autonomous; analyst oversight optional |
| Consistency across cases | Varies by analyst | Deterministic methodology |